S.A. And Iran Questionnaires

Questionnaires are samples of structured questions that will seek directive responses from the respondents in the field of study. In order to arrive at making decisions, there are several considerations that the president of the U.S.A. needs to know from the public and the secretary of state. Such questions will be included in the questionnaires. The questionnaires will be supplied to various respondents. These respondents are thought to have consistent information as regards the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process matters in the world. Questionnaires are relevant when it comes to exhausting on the exiting trends of management in the country.

Interviews

Interviews refer to face-to-face approaches of seeking to elicit information from the concerned parties in the field. The interviews that will be conducted will seek to establish the views of the U.S. citizens. The views will consider many aspects as regards how the country has handled foreign matters and diplomacy in the past and at present. The interviews will solicit equitable data that will enable the researcher. This will enable him/her to dwell on making sure that it has fulfilled the innate responsibilities of getting relevant and up-to-date information in the field.

Interviewing is one of the most influential and functional ways of bringing out relevant views and concerns of the respondents on the topic. Through the interviews, the research will be able to establish common methodologies of decision making by the U.S. president. Moreover, the study research will establish the common approaches of managing the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process through involvement of the public. Citizens are indispensable when it comes to ensuring that all the available measures of growth and development have been met. The citizen interaction with other nations is also a contributor of what considerations the president makes as regards foreign policies.

Sampling

Samples will be collected from various departments. These departments house information concerning how the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process is made in the country. Through sampling, the study will seek to relay equitable examples that have been of utmost concern when it comes to management of the internal affairs in the country. In most cases, the research will endeavour into collecting samples of the various decisions that have been made by the present and previous presidents of the U.S.A.

Research on existing texts and theories

One of the foundations that will elicit equitable information to the study is the use of the exiting research materials. These materials relay how the state of affairs has been existing in the U.S.A. And with relation to other nations. The exiting standards of management in the U.S. are categorical of the historical backgrounds set in the past. The validity of this research method will be based on the stability and availability of the past record of work done by the past leadership. According to the research materials that are in the field, it is equitable to know that the state of affairs in the U.S.A. has not been dependent on self-interests and good relations that are forged by the president. The president of the U.S.A. has participated in ensuring growth and development of the diplomatic affairs between his/her nation and other states in the world

From the existing texts and written papers, it is evident that all the available materials try to establish how the president makes decisions based on the old states of work. In order to bring out the immediate and past methods of management, the study will reiterate on the validity and reliability of history in order to understand the state of decision-making protocols in the country

. The present trends of decision making by the president are dependent on what the past leaders decided. For instance, the decision made by President Bush is rudimentary and influential to what President Obama will make as regards Iran. Iran has been in constant battles with the U.S.A. In many perceptions. Therefore, the history will be relevant in relaying what the future prospects and decisions have to take and points of concern

Summary and synthesis of the arguments and findings

The existence and stability of the international relations between the U.S.A. And Iran are replicated on the nature of activities between these two nations. On order to arrive at a fulfillment that all the two nations are in good terms, the presidents are the figurative agents who supply decisions that affect on one another. The summary of the research will reiterate on measures to be taken as concerns the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. This will happen with regard to Iran and many other nations. Moreover, the arguments will be given a summative conclusion based on the nature or state of internal and external affairs between the U.S.A. And Iran.

Empirical data

U.S. - Iran Relations: An Analytic Compendium of U.S. Policies, Laws, and Regulations

The relationship...

continues to be on a struggle. The U.S.A. has been imposing sanctions on the government of Iran for the past years. This generation of hate and hostility has strained the presidential policies between the two nations. Little engagements are of any profit between these two nations. Distrust has resulted in immediate hate between the people of the two nations. Studies indicate that the present sense of imagination and treatment received from the opponent nations deserves a lot to make the two countries differ. The attacks of 9/11 are related to the tense relationship between the two countries.
Research questions

The study will resolve around handling a number of research questions. These are questions directed at reflecting on the innate correspondences and management details contained in the U.S. foreign policy decision-making processes. Moreover, the study endeavors to use a number of questions that are related to the relationship between the U.S.A. And other nations like Iran. The following are the study questions:

The U.S. president uses a number of considerations in order to influence on the policies touching the U.S.A. And Iran

The U.S. presidential policy takes the form of the Mexican presidential decision making process. Iran offers a vivid example through which the president of the united state has to involve numerous considerations in the society. The Mexican revolution of 1910 was the war that saw men, women and children pulling together to see a new dawn of liberation; the Mexicans and Americans were already tired with the dictatorship that the then president was subjecting them to; the foreigners were getting by far better treatment than the Mexicans themselves. At the very start of his regime, everyone knew Diaz to have good intentions for Iran, he helped create stability and bring crimes to a low level in the country, however, after a while he lost track and turned into a dictatorship. The most contagious issue according to the Mexicans was that land companies were taking control of extensive tracks of land. These are land pieces that belonged to Mexicans this was going to render up to 97% of them landless. The U.S. presidential decision making on Iran takes this avenue where numerous considerations have to be met by the president.

In a bid to have their grievances addressed, the Mexicans resorted to fight that Porfirio's regime. The government was further accused of neglect in addressing public service issues and needs of the middle and lower classes. The youth, as opposed to their parents, could not hold their patience anymore

. The likes of Madero and his team are being remembered for their effort in bringing back to normalcy the lives of many Mexicans. Their courage and selflessness is what remains to be remembered; despite the fact that they had no army in the first place, he had education and resources, he still could see the importance of counteracting the violation of human rights by the Diaz government. The decision-making process was marked by innate consideration of the many factors of production in the country. The diplomatic existence between the U.S.A. And Iran deserves planned protocols that ensure cordial existence between these two nations.

In an oversight, Diaz had a team that saw that they objectively remained in power for as long as they wanted, this heightened the anger in the stewards of democracy. Madero a serious one, declared his fight against Diaz's dictatorship and in November 1910 while in exile at the United States, he denounced the re-election of Diaz as the president, went ahead and declared himself the president. This marked the turning point of Diaz's politics of dictatorship. Madero's ascension to power was never an easy one. In the first place, he was facing a dictator whose power is backed by resources and a wide network of influential politicians and businesspersons who sided with him. The success of the lethal existence between the U.S.A. And Iran can be likened to the existence between the U.S.A. And Mexico during this period.

Successful revolutions were carried out in different states of Mexico, and these saw the peasants reclaim their rights from the ranchers and property owners. The return of Madero was highly reckoned by other rebel leaders for having jumpstarted revolution. The…